HACCP programs should be strictly related to food safety.
Critical Control Points should only be used to control those points in a process where lack of control will likely result in the development of a potential safety hazard.
They should not be used to control non hazardous situations which are of serious regulatory, consumer or economic consequence.
Too much monitoring (i.e. inclusion of non-hazardous points) will dilutes out the HACCP effort, resulting in nothing being monitored or the wrong points being monitored.
There will be then no insurance that the product being release meets all safety requirements and therefore, a potential hazard may be delivered to consumers.
Non-safety related monitoring procedures should be part of a standard quality assurance programs.
HACCP Programs
The Most Popular Posts
-
Chemical hazard are chemicals that can get into food by improper storage of chemical or chemical containers or by using chemicals improperly... -
Some bacteria enter the intestine live, survive the acidic environment of the stomach, and then produce a harmful toxin inside the human dig... -
A biological hazards is an agent in food with potential to cause human illness. It is the most significant hazards in our food. Biological h...
-
If HACCP is not properly applied, then it may not result in an effective control system. This may be due to improperly trained or untrained...
-
Anything foreign to the food can be considered a physical hazard. Dust, dirt, hair, metal shavings and broken glass, for example, are items ...
